Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 791 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 6% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 110 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$133.77 vs CA$303.46
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$133.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74583 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
104
94.54545454545455%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
44%
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74584 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
90.82426127527216%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i5-6600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |