Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6500 is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Celeron G3900 - 198 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-6500 - CA$33.99 vs CA$105.65
- Up to 66% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-6500 - CA$0.18 vs CA$0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-6500 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
198
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
33.9622641509434%
Price, CA$
CA$105.65
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$105.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53001 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
96.46464646464646%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$33.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53000 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
49.362786745964314%
Multi-Core
992
30.836182778986633%
Intel Core i5-6500 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |