Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3112 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - CA$118.88 vs CA$164.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-14100F - CA$0.65 vs CA$0.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-6500 - 212 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
182
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$118.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$118.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18240 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
212
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.77/FPS
84%
Price, CA$
CA$164
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$164 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6500 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |