Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1460 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 37 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-4300M - 178 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7596 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |