Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 600 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - CA$303.46 vs CA$435.94
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 5% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 253 vs 242 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
242
95.65217391304348%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74978 minutes ago
Buy for CA$435.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
75.06426735218508%
Multi-Core
5794
93.19607527746501%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |