Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14500 is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14500
- Performs up to 36% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1620 - 204 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-14500 - CA$36.89 vs CA$329.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-14500 - CA$0.25 vs CA$1.61 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
204
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.61/FPS
15%
Price, CA$
CA$329
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
150
73%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14500 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |