Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 26% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G4900 - 158 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$49.99 vs CA$304.99
- Up to 79% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-11600K - CA$0.4 vs CA$1.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.93/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13566 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13566 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |