Buy on Amazon
CA$218.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1840 - 130 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - CA$41.21 vs CA$218.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11600 - CA$0.37 vs CA$1.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.68/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$218.99
18%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11600 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$218.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
111
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1840 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.8 GHz 2M 53W LGA1150
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
