Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 45% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8350 - 650 vs 448 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - CA$182.45 vs CA$319.02
- Up to 16% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-11600 - CA$0.41 vs CA$0.49 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
650
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
83%
Price, CA$
CA$319.02
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$319.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12468 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
448
68%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12468 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |