Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 46% better in F1 23 than Celeron G4900 - 233 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - CA$49.99 vs CA$406.88
- Up to 82% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-10600 - CA$0.31 vs CA$1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
233
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.75/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$406.88
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$406.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
160
68%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |