Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1620 - 191 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - CA$32.99 vs CA$227.99
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$227.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77504 minutes ago
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77503 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
25.902469917669414%
Multi-Core
723
11.708502024291498%
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |