Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8109U outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8109U is 2367 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8109U
- Performs up to 13% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-6100 - 228 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 28 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8109U - 6 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
202
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8109U | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |