Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 240 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 36% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$193.88 vs CA$303.46
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-7100 - 178 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$193.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74464 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74464 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
93.66479550922213%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |