Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1137 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$85.99 vs CA$200.98
- Up to 57% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$0.49 vs CA$1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-4370 - 178 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
177
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$85.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$85.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.13/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$200.98
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$200.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |