Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - CA$85.99 vs CA$234.99
- Up to 61% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-10600K - CA$0.34 vs CA$0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-4370 - 266 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
250
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$85.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$85.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
266
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.88/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$234.99
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$234.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |