Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2724 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 67% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$36.99 vs CA$113.5
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Core i3-4160 - 204 vs 196 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$36.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
66.37554585152839%
Multi-Core
2072
76.8545994065282%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |