Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2724 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 12% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$98.88 vs CA$112.98
- Up to 3% better value when playing New World than Celeron G6900 - CA$0.92 vs CA$0.95 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 11% better in New World than Core i3-4160 - 119 vs 107 FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
107
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16852 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
119
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
96%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16851 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |