Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1368 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-4160 - 248 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 12 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
92.36111111111111%
Multi-Core
2072
42.80107415823177%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |