Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 2830 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - CA$98.88 vs CA$169.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 5600 - CA$0.79 vs CA$1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4160 - 143 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
125
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7588 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
143
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.18/FPS
66%
Price, CA$
CA$169
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7587 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |