Key Differences
In short — FX-6100 outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6100 is 643 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-350M - 189 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 6 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
189
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |