Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4380 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 26% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-350M - 110 vs 87 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-350M doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
110
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |