Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 11% better in Fortnite than Celeron G3900 - 238 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - CA$21.99 vs CA$182.97
- Up to 87% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-13100F - CA$0.1 vs CA$0.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
238
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.77/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$182.97
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$182.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
214
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$21.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$21.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |