Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Deathloop than Core i7-2600K - 191 vs 170 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - CA$151.58 vs CA$184.25
- Up to 7% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i3-13100F - CA$0.89 vs CA$0.96 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
191
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
92%
Price, CA$
CA$184.25
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$184.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
170
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$151.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$151.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |