Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 16% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G3900 - 145 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - CA$67.21 vs CA$139.99
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Buy for CA$67.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
37.12460063897763%
Multi-Core
992
20.688216892596458%
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |