Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1988 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-8320 - 110 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$108.0 vs CA$111.14
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |