Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2865 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-875K - 240 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-875K - CA$44.99 vs CA$112.0
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75504 minutes ago
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75504 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |