Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 50 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - CA$49.99 vs CA$280.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 3 2200G - CA$0.31 vs CA$1.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G4900 - 170 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17844 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
170
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.65/FPS
18%
Price, CA$
CA$280
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17845 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |