Buy on Amazon
CA$67.21
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1128 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$67.21 vs CA$574.75
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G3900 - 483 vs 455 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$67.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 279 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
483
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$574.75
11%
FPS Winner
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for CA$574.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
45.604395604395606%
Multi-Core
992
13.308290850550039%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
