Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 1225 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - CA$96.1 vs CA$410.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-9700KF - CA$0.64 vs CA$2.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G3900 - 161 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$96.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$96.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
161
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.55/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$410
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$410 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |