Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - CA$21.99 vs CA$608.98
- Up to 94% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-13900KF - CA$0.14 vs CA$2.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 69% better in Rust than Celeron G3900 - 269 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
59%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$21.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$21.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
269
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.26/FPS
6%
Price, CA$
CA$608.98
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$608.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |