Buy on Amazon
CA$21.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 1771 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - CA$21.99 vs CA$575.0
- Up to 96% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 7 3800XT - CA$0.13 vs CA$3.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3900 - 184 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
167
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$21.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8 Processor - Affordable and Reliable
Buy for CA$21.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.12/FPS
4%
Price, CA$
CA$575
3%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-core, 16-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor Without Cooler
Buy for CA$575 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
