Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 2227 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - CA$36.89 vs CA$238.62
- Up to 59% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-9600KF - CA$1.68 vs CA$4.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 164% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1620 - 58 vs 22 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 6 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
22
37%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
58
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.11/FPS
40%
Price, CA$
CA$238.62
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$238.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |