Key Differences
In short — FX-8370 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8370 is 975 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Performs up to 4% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron B815 - 157 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 8 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
157
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$420
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$420 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |