Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 219 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Ready or Not than Celeron 3865U - 259 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 24 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
259
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$360.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$360.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 698 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |