Key Differences
In short — Xeon w7-2495X outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w7-2495X is 2234 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w7-2495X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon w7-2495X
- Performs up to 15% better in Valheim than Celeron 3865U - 218 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 48 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Xeon w7-2495X
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
392
16.60313426514189%
Multi-Core
692
3.6967786740744697%
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 15th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon W |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Sapphire Rapids |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 4677 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 48 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
