Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 1530 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 171 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$217.54 vs CA$360.9
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
98.83040935672514%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$360.9
60%
Buy for CA$360.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Buy for CA$217.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
93.54581673306774%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |