Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1929 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 12% better in HITMAN 2 than Core i7-3770K - 133 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i7-3770K - CA$2.86 vs CA$2.94 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$350.0 vs CA$380.18
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$380.18
92%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$380.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |