Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 600 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 58 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$145.0 vs CA$184.49
- Up to 25% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$2.5 vs CA$3.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
55
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.35/FPS
74%
Price, CA$
CA$184.49
78%
Buy for CA$184.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
58
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |