Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 840 days older than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - CA$175.0 vs CA$237.71
- Up to 26% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-7700 - CA$1.38 vs CA$1.86 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-9100F - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
127
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$175
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 770 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.86/FPS
74%
Price, CA$
CA$237.71
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$237.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 768 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |