Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2550 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770K - 174 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$104.99 vs CA$214.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770K - CA$0.6 vs CA$1.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$104.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |