Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 897 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$174.9 vs CA$669.59
- Up to 68% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-13900F - CA$1.34 vs CA$4.24 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 158 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 32 vs 12 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
131
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$174.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.24/FPS
31%
Price, CA$
CA$669.59
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$669.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |