Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1457 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 32% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-9400F - 732 vs 555 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$117.62 vs CA$529.18
- Up to 71% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.21 vs CA$0.72 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
732
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
29%
Price, CA$
CA$529.18
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$529.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
555
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$117.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$117.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |