Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Valheim than Core i5-11400F - 226 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$194.99 vs CA$529.18
- Up to 60% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.93 vs CA$2.34 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
226
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.34/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$529.18
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$529.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
210
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$194.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$194.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |