Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1277 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$380.0 vs CA$669.59
- Up to 21% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.96 vs CA$1.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 39% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 3600X - 551 vs 397 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
397
72%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$380
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$380 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
551
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.22/FPS
78%
Price, CA$
CA$669.59
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$669.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |