Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1829 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-8700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-8700 - 208 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$398.97 vs CA$474.95
- Up to 1% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-13900F - CA$2.25 vs CA$2.28 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.28/FPS
98%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
177
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$398.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$398.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |