Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F and the cheaper Core i5-13400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-13400 - 158 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$319.3 vs CA$474.95
- Up to 28% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-13900F - CA$2.16 vs CA$3.01 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.01/FPS
71%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$319.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$319.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |