Buy on Amazon
CA$474.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-10700 - 136 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$383.99 vs CA$474.95
- Up to 11% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-13900F - CA$3.12 vs CA$3.49 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.49/FPS
89%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
80%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$383.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-10700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W, BX8070110700
Buy for CA$383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
