Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 3700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1277 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen 7 3700X - 152 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$289.0 vs CA$474.95
- Up to 31% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-13900F - CA$2.14 vs CA$3.12 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
152
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.12/FPS
68%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
135
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$289
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$289 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |