Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2054 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 17% better in Rust than Core i3-3220 - 184 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$39.99 vs CA$142.72
- Up to 68% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$0.25 vs CA$0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
184
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
32%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
157
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |