Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2423 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - CA$69.88 vs CA$138.88
- Up to 42% better value when playing New World than Core i3-9100F - CA$0.71 vs CA$1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 15% better in New World than Core i3-3220 - 114 vs 99 FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
99
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14186 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
114
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.22/FPS
58%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |