Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - CA$69.88 vs CA$118.88
- Up to 34% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i3-7100 - CA$0.19 vs CA$0.29 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-3220 - 407 vs 374 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
374
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14148 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
407
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.29/FPS
65%
Price, CA$
CA$118.88
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$118.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |